Skip to content

How Accent scaled without adding headcount 

5 min read 04.08.2026

Written by Team bookU

Image

Accent Jobs is Belgium’s high-volume staffing agency. Their Dedicated division places thousands of people every day across hundreds of locations — for food producers, cleaning companies, and retailers that need dozens of workers at unpredictable times. The challenge was not filling shifts. The challenge was the cost of filling the shifts.

About Accent Jobs

Accent Jobs is one of Belgium's largest recruitment and staffing agencies. The Dedicated division, run by Operational Director Ben De Block, is their high-margin, high-complexity segment: they take on the largest accounts (food producers, cleaning companies, major retailers) with the highest shift volumes and the tightest margins. These are the clients that operate 24/7, need workers on short notice, and require flawless coordination across multiple locations. For Accent, managing these accounts profitably meant solving the operational cost of coordination — not the skill cost of hiring, but the admin cost of connecting clients to workers.

The challenge: double work, fragmented communication, no scale

  • Double data entry across systems — clients planned their workforce in Excel/paper or even a whiteboard, Accent re-entered into their own systems
  • Fragmented communication — no single source of truth — planning was communicated via spreadsheets, emails, phone calls or even printouts
  • Manual contract generation — every shift meant someone re-typing client planning into Accent's ATS
  • Manual worker contact — SMS, WhatsApp, or phone calls to every candidate for every shift
  • Location-level complexity — cleaning clients with five or six locations per day meant multiply the mess: order slips re-read, details re-typed, manually communicate-location by-location instructions by SMS chains
  • Margin erosion — at low staffing margins, every administrative hour re-entering data instead of generating revenue is a direct hit to profit, every miscommunication is a missed shift.

    As Accent’s portfolio grows, the ceiling becomes clear: you cannot scale manual coordination.

We were spending all our time bridging gaps between systems. The client’s spreadsheet, our ATS, the worker’s phone — three separate worlds that someone had to keep aligned manually.”

How bookU Staffing  made the difference

Accent went live on bookU's  Staffing platform starting with food and retail clients, then extended to cleaning, the most complex use case.

  1. One unified planning layer, from client to worker

    bookU connects to Accent's CRM, ATS, and back-office in a single unified layer. Client requests flow in via shift intake. Automatic matching identifies the right candidate for each shift. Contracts flow out. Candidate notifications follow automatically.

  2. Contracts generated automatically

    No re-typing. No manual entry. The planning data flows straight through to contract generation.

  3. Worker notifications in thirty minutes

    Once a contract is ready, the worker gets a notification in his employee app within thirty minutes — no SMS chains, no follow-up calls.

  4. Digital work instructions per location

    For cleaning clients managing multiple sites per day, workers now receive detailed instructions per location: where supplies are stored, which products to use, navigation details — all in the app. No more SMS chains or verbal handoffs.

  5. Candidates see the full picture

    Workers receive shift confirmations, location details, and instructions in one place, any time. For the "multi-jobbers" (workers deliberately combining a primary job with flexible side work), this makes Accent's jobs significantly more attractive than competitors still running on SMS and phone calls.

  6. The admin cost drops immediately

    At each client account, the planner saves approximately half a day per week by eliminating double data entry. Across 40 Dedicated clients, the aggregate admin capacity freed is substantial — and it scales without adding headcount to the planning function.

Results at glance

AreaBefore bookUWith bookU
Client planningSpreadsheet, email, paperImported into one system
Data entryManual re-entry into ATSAutomatic from bookU
Contract generationManual, error-proneAutomatic in the same flow
Worker notificationSMS, WhatsApp, phone callsApp notification in 30 minutes
Work instructionsSMS chains and verbalDigital instructions per location
Source of truthNone — three separate systemsOne unified layer
Admin time per clientHalf day per week lost to re-entryRecurring capacity freed
Candidate experienceScattered across SMS and emailOne app, one source of truth
Margin per placementEroding under admin costsProtected by automation
ScalabilityCeiling hit at X accountsScale without adding headcount

The result: time savings, better candidate experience and a path to scale

For Accent's low-margin accounts, the math is straightforward: half a day per week saved per client × 40 accounts = significant recurring capacity freed, with no headcount increase.

The candidate experience improves too — workers see shifts, locations, and instructions in one app instead of scattered across SMS and email.

By the end of 2026, Accent will have rolled this out across all 40 Dedicated clients, followed by Master Vendor Distribution to compete for large multi-agency tenders.

Do the math: half a day per week per account, times 40 clients. That recurring admin capacity is what lets us scale without hiring more planners.””

Why this case matters

Ben De Block is not a technology enthusiast who got excited about a new platform. He is an experienced operational leader who spent over a year evaluating tools before committing, and who has spent fifteen years learning where the real margins in staffing are won and lost.

His observation about the industry is worth sitting with: the entire staffing sector still largely operates the way it did 20 or 25 years ago. A vacancy arrives. Then the search begins.

The agencies that break from that reactive model, that build the infrastructure to find the right worker before the vacancy even exists, are the ones positioned to win the next decade. The planning layer is where that shift gets operationalised. bookU is the infrastructure that makes it possible.

Written by Team bookU

Always receive the latest updates
in your inbox.

Be the first to read our monthly updates and insights.

Back to customer stories overview

More customer stories

Preview website linkshare tekst 1 jpg

How TMI transformed its scheduling operations with bookU Staffing

TMI replaced its outdated manual planning process with bookU’s Connected Staffing solution. Cutting shift fills from 5 – 6 manual steps to one click and planner onboarding from three months to just thirty minutes. The result: TMI’s childcare division now runs with just two planners, who spend their time building relationships with care workers instead of chasing admin.

Read more